Search for: "CHI MEI INNOLUX" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On August 23, 2010, Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan, Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc. of San Jose, California, and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas (collectively, “CMI”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Rogers denied Respondents Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., and Innolux Corp’s. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:17 pm by Alex Gasser
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainants Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc., and Innolux Corporation and Respondents Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation America, Sony Electronics, Inc., and Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:58 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents in this investigation are:  Chimei Innolux Corporation, Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., MStar Semiconductor, Inc., Qisda Corporation, Qisda American Corporation, Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., BenQ Corporation, BenQ America Corp., BenQ Latin America, and Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:24 am by Eric Schweibenz
The investigation is based on an August 23, 2010 complaint and September 2 and 10 letters supplementing the complaint filed by Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan, Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc. of San Jose, California, and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain liquid crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. of San Jose, California MStar Semiconductor, Inc. of Taiwan Qisda Corporation of Taiwan Qisda American Corporation of Irvine, California Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China BenQ Corporation of Taiwan BenQ America Corp. of Irvine,… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:53 am by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainants in this matter are Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC and the Respondents are Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Innolux Corp. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:44 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Complainants Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC (collectively, “Thomson”) filed a motion to compel Respondents Chimei Innolux Corp., Innolux Corp., and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:14 pm by Alex Gasser
Although Respondents Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Innolux Corp. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Rogers denied Respondents Chimei Innolux Corp., Innolux Corp., and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainants in this matter are Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC (collectively, “Thomson”), and the Respondents are Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Innolux Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:12 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan, Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. of San Jose, California, and MStar Semiconductor, Inc. of Taiwan (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) through the manufacture, sale for importation, importation, and/or sale within the U.S. after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices, including monitors, televisions, and modules, and components… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent No. 6,134,092 entitled ILLUMINATION DEVICE FOR NON-EMISSIVE DISPLAYS and owned by Chi Mei Innolux. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent No. 6,134,092 entitled ILLUMINATION DEVICE FOR NON-EMISSIVE DISPLAYS and owned by Chi Mei Innolux. [read post]